> Is there a particular reason we're only retrospecting on placement? I think that we need to have a concrete topic that applied to newton and will apply to ocata in order to be productive. I think there will be specific things we can change in ocata that will have an actual impact on major work for the cycle.
> I suspect we can map many of the ideas and experiences from a > retrospective devoted to placement to more general concerns but I'd > hate for people who had no involvement in it but are concerned about > Nova to feel excluded. > > [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-newton-retrospective As has been demonstrated in that etherpad, if we try to retrospect every aspect of newton, we'd need a week and wouldn't have time to have the other sessions we need in order to plan for ocata. Picking two major ongoing topics seems like the best way to frame a useful discussion to me. --Dan __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
