Tagging kolla
On 29/09/16 16:22, Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
Agree with Christian, this is our internal wiring. As long as we
provide automated upgrade procedure which will seamlessly migrate from
heka to alternative we want, we should be good without deprecation per
se.
Cheers,
Michal
On 29 September 2016 at 04:36, Christian Berendt
<bere...@betacloud-solutions.de> wrote:
On 29 Sep 2016, at 06:26, Steven Dake (stdake) <std...@cisco.com> wrote:
If you have a different parsing of the deprecation policy, feel free to chime
in.
Heka is only used as an internal component of Kolla and is not provided as a
service for the operators. It should be sufficient to replace Heka by something
else without deprecating it.
Christian.
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
