Option 2 2016-09-20 16:07 GMT+02:00 Steven Dake (stdake) <std...@cisco.com>:
> Consider this a reversal of my vote for Debian deprecation. > > Swapnil, thanks for bringing this fact to our attention. It was missing > from the original vote. I don’t know why I didn’t bring up Benedikt’s > contributions (which were substantial) just as Paul’s were substantial for > Oracle Linux. I guess the project is too busy for me to keep all the > context in my brain. The fact that there is no debian gate really is > orthogonal to the discussion in my mind. With this action we would be > turning away a contributor who has made real contributions, and send the > signal his work doesn’t matter or fit in with the project plans. > > This is totally the wrong message to send. Further others might interpret > such an act as a “we don’t care about anyone’s contributions” which is not > the culture we have cultivated since origination of the project. We have > built a culture of “you build it, we will accept it once it passes > review”. We want to hold on to that – it’s a really good thing for Kolla. > There have been rumblings in this thread and on irc of the expanding > support matrix and our (lack) of dealing with it appropriately. I think > there are other ways to solve that problem without a policy hammer. > > I added the fedora work originally along with others who have since moved > on to other projects. I personally have been unsuccessful at maintaining > it, because of the change to DNF (And PTL is a 100% time commitment without > a whole lot of time for implementation work). That said Fedora moves too > fast for me personally to commit to maintenance there – so my vote there > remains unchanged. > > Regards > -steve > > > > > > On 9/20/16, 2:34 AM, "Paul Bourke" <paul.bou...@oracle.com> wrote: > > If it's the case Benedict or noone else is interested in continuing > Debian, I can reverse my vote. Though it seems I'll be outvoted anyway > ;) > > On 20/09/16 10:21, Swapnil Kulkarni wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Paul Bourke <paul.bou...@oracle.com> > wrote: > >> -1 for deprecating Debian. > >> > >> As I mentioned in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/369183/, Debian > support > >> was added incrementally by Benedikt Trefzer as recently as June. So > it's > >> reasonable to believe there is at least one active user of Debian. > >> > >> I would like to try get some input from him on whether he's still > using it > >> and would be interested in helping maintain by adding gates etc. > >> > >> On 19/09/16 18:44, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > >>> > >>> Kolla core reviewer team, > >>> > >>> Kolla supports multiple Linux distros now, including > >>> > >>> * Ubuntu > >>> * CentOS > >>> * RHEL > >>> * Fedora > >>> * Debian > >>> * OracleLinux > >>> > >>> But only Ubuntu, CentOS, and OracleLinux are widely used and we > have > >>> robust gate to ensure the quality. > >>> > >>> For Debian, Kolla hasn't any test for it and nobody reports any bug > >>> about it( i.e. nobody use Debian as base distro image). We (kolla > >>> team) also do not have enough resources to support so many Linux > >>> distros. I prefer to deprecate Debian support now. > >>> > >>> Please vote: > >>> > >>> 1. Kolla needs support Debian( if so, we need some guys to set up > the > >>> gate and fix all the issues ASAP in O cycle) > >>> 2. Kolla should deprecate Debian support > >>> > >>> Voting is open for 7 days until September 27st, 2016. > >>> > >> > >> ____________________________________________________________ > ______________ > >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject: > unsubscribe > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > > +1 for #2 > > > > I agree with reasoning from Paul, though Debian support was being > > added incrementally by Benedikt Trefzer but it has been stopped in > > middle and all patches in the queue were abandoned [1] > > > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/build-debian,n,z > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > ______________ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject: > unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > ______________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject: > unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Mobil: +49 176 10567592 E-Mail: mew...@evoila.de evoila GmbH Wilhelm-Theodor-Römheld-Str. 34 55130 Mainz Germany Geschäftsführer: Johannes Hiemer Amtsgericht Mainz HRB 42719 Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet. This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If You are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev