On Wed, Sep 7, 2016, at 06:33 PM, Adrian Turjak wrote: > Heat is a bit of overkill for something as tiny as this. I agree. And though it's been a while since I've looked at Heat I didn't get the impression that it was designed for this sort of usage: a simple API call that orchestrates networking and instance setup that then allows you to interact with Nova/Neutron directly for further actions. > I was mainly responding to Andrew Laski's comment talking about a > service exactly like Minstral, for smaller cross project orchestration > of finite tasks. > On 8/09/2016 10:12 AM, "Fox, Kevin M" <kevin....@pnnl.gov> wrote: > > > > I've typically used heat to do this too. As it has a nice way out > > of the box to to undo the actions it does. > > > > Thanks, > > Kevin > > ________________________________ > > From: Adrian Turjak [adri...@catalyst.net.nz] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 2:34 PM > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][OSC][Nova][Neutron] Launch > > instance with Floating IP > > > > This is exactly what something like Minstral would be fantastic > > for. Multi-project workflow. > > > > Rather than try and build logic like this directly into nova, looks > > at extending something like Minstral with a basic easy to call > > task. > ____________________________________________________________________- > ________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev- > requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
