On 09/07/2016 01:29 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-07 09:11:58 -0500:
On 09/07/2016 08:58 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-07 08:21:50 -0500:
https://review.openstack.org/366298
This is just a bump to upper-constraints so is more minor to get testing
working and fix the bug that occurred in Gnocchi (and possibly others).
We are able to mask the 'bad' versions of oslo.db and unmask pymysql
0.7.7 after the freeze (and backport them to stable/newton) so this is
easier to merge.
If we have a known-bad version of the library, maybe it would be better
to incorporate that info into the global-requirements list before we
branch the requirements repository? I'm not sure what we've done in
this case for past cycles.
Doug
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Are you fine with the knock on effects that a gr update would cause?
What do we have that uses oslo.db and is itself a library that would
need to be re-released?
I would assume Gnocchi which acts as a backend for Ceilometer.
Doug
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
