On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Honza Pokorny <ho...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hello folks, > > We've been using port 3000 for the GUI during development and testing. > Now that we're working on packaging and shipping our code, we're > wondering if port 3000 is still the best choice. > > Would 3000 conflict with any other services? Is there a better option? > > Thanks > > Honza Pokorny > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Based on http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/config-reference/firewalls-default-ports.html 3000 should be unused so far. IANA has assigned 3000 and there is widespread use colliding with it as well, but neither looks like something that would collide in Undercloud: hbci 3000 tcp HBCI [Kurt_Haubner] [Kurt_Haubner] hbci 3000 udp HBCI [Kurt_Haubner] [Kurt_Haubner] remoteware-cl 3000 tcp RemoteWare Client [Tim_Farley] [Tim_Farley] This entry records an unassigned but widespread use remoteware-cl 3000 udp RemoteWare Client [Tim_Farley] [Tim_Farley] This entry records an unassigned but widespread use So by the quick look the 3000 is likely as bad choice as any unassigned for it by IANA one. - Erno __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
