@Kevin: full ack. Also, using S3 compliant storage for Glance is quite common, too.
2016-07-20 19:12 GMT+02:00 Fox, Kevin M <kevin....@pnnl.gov>: > We use ceph with cinder and glance. I don't see a reason not to. > > We do not set nova to use it for anything but cinder volumes though. > > The reason being, if you set it up that way, your users have no way of > opting out of the potential performance hit if using no local storage for > non pets. > > If you leave it nova local, you can always still get ceph remote storage > for the whole vm by requesting the root disk be volume backed. > > We also already have a ceph deployment managed without kolla, and that's > unlikely to change. > > So, for our site, our settings would probably be: > 1. Deploy Ceph (enable_ceph="no") > 2. Use Ceph with Glance (enable_ceph_glance="yes") > 3. Use Ceph with Cinder (enable_ceph_cinder="yes") > 4. Use Ceph with Nova (enable_ceph_nova="no") > > Thanks, > Kevin > ________________________________________ > From: Jeffrey Zhang [zhang.lei....@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 9:51 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack Kolla - External Ceph > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) <std...@cisco.com> > wrote: > > > > At this point, I feel we are going a direction in which we try to wrap > > everything anybody could possibly want to configure with Kolla by making > > extensive use of global.yml. We would have to introduce flags indicating > a > > couple of different scenarios: > > > > 1. Deploy Ceph (already there: enable_ceph="yes") > > 2. Use Ceph with Glance (enable_ceph_glance="yes") > > 3. Use Ceph with Cinder (enable_ceph_cinder="yes") > > 4. Use Ceph with Nova (enable_ceph_nova="yes") > > > > > > I disagree. If ceph is enabled, then ceph should be used, if ceph is not > > enabled, then ceph shouldn't be used. That implies all of OpenStack > either > > uses Ceph or not. So we really just need enable_ceph. > > > why we need separate configuration for ceph? I think if ceph is > enable, all the service should use ceph, too. > > -- > Regards, > Jeffrey Zhang > Blog: http://xcodest.me > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Mobil: +49 176 10567592 E-Mail: mew...@evoila.de evoila GmbH Wilhelm-Theodor-Römheld-Str. 34 55130 Mainz Germany Geschäftsführer: Johannes Hiemer Amtsgericht Mainz HRB 42719 Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet. This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If You are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev