+1 I agree 2016-07-12 13:55 GMT-03:00 Paul Bourke <paul.bou...@oracle.com>:
> Sounds reasonable +1 > > > On 12/07/16 15:32, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > >> Hey guys, >> >> Since our project matured, we decided that we should have a discussion >> regarding our spec process. >> >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-N-midcycle-specs >> >> Currently we do specs for most critical things, and they require majority >> vote. >> >> We want to introduce another way, to enable non-nuclear specs. >> To summarize our discussion so far: >> >> 1. Specs will require only 2 * +2 by default >> 2. Specs sit at minimum 2 weeks in gerrit before first +2 arrives, so >> other people will have time to look at it >> 3. Any core can require a rollcall vote - then it becomes rollcall vote >> 4. If nobody calls for rollcall vote, after 2 weeks spec can be merged >> with normal 2 * +2 >> >> Thoughts? >> Michal >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
