Thanks your response.
Regards, Juno Zhu IBM China Development Labs (CDL) Cloud IaaS Lab Email: na...@cn.ibm.com 5F, Building 10, 399 Keyuan Road, Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park, Pudong New District, Shanghai, China (201203) From: Cathy Zhang <cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com> To: Na Zhu/China/IBM@IBMCN Cc: Farhad Sunavala <fs...@yahoo.com>, John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>, Henry Fourie <louis.fou...@huawei.com>, Kyle Mestery <mest...@mestery.com>, "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com>, Ryan Moats <rmo...@us.ibm.com>, Richard Theis <rth...@us.ibm.com>, Stephen Wong <stephen.kf.w...@gmail.com>, "Vikram Choudhary" <vikram.choudh...@huawei.com> Date: 2016/06/29 09:21 Subject: RE: Change in openstack/networking-sfc[master]: Networking-sfc / OVN Driver Please see inline. Cathy From: Na Zhu [mailto:na...@cn.ibm.com] Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 9:56 PM To: Cathy Zhang Cc: Farhad Sunavala; John McDowall; Henry Fourie; Kyle Mestery; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Russell Bryant; Ryan Moats; Richard Theis; Stephen Wong; Vikram Choudhary Subject: RE: Change in openstack/networking-sfc[master]: Networking-sfc / OVN Driver Hi Cathy, Thanks your response. Another question, how to create different port-chains for different tenants, and these chains consist of the same port pair group. In my test scenario, port-pair-group created by tenant A is not visible for tenant B. Cathy> Each port pair group has an associated tenant ID, so it belongs to a tenant, that is why it is not visible. The same tenant can have multiple chains, eg. One for voice, one for video, one for data, and these chains can share the port pair group. But different tenants can not share the port pair group. Regards, Juno Zhu IBM China Development Labs (CDL) Cloud IaaS Lab Email: na...@cn.ibm.com 5F, Building 10, 399 Keyuan Road, Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park, Pudong New District, Shanghai, China (201203) From: Cathy Zhang <cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com> To: Na Zhu/China/IBM@IBMCN, Henry Fourie <louis.fou...@huawei.com>, "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Cc: Ryan Moats <rmo...@us.ibm.com>, Kyle Mestery < mest...@mestery.com>, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com>, Richard Theis < rth...@us.ibm.com>, Stephen Wong <stephen.kf.w...@gmail.com>, Vikram Choudhary <vikram.choudh...@huawei.com>, Farhad Sunavala <fs...@yahoo.com >, "John McDowall" <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com> Date: 2016/06/28 12:29 Subject: RE: Change in openstack/networking-sfc[master]: Networking-sfc / OVN Driver Hi Na, Please see inline for my reply. Cathy -----Original Message----- From: Na Zhu (Code Review) [mailto:rev...@openstack.org] Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 8:08 PM To: Henry Fourie Cc: Ryan Moats; Na Zhu; Kyle Mestery; Russell Bryant; Richard Theis; Stephen Wong; Cathy Zhang; Vikram Choudhary; Farhad Sunavala; John McDowall Subject: Change in openstack/networking-sfc[master]: Networking-sfc / OVN Driver Na Zhu has posted comments on this change. Change subject: Networking-sfc / OVN Driver ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/333172/1/doc/source/sfc_ovn_driver.rst File doc/source/sfc_ovn_driver.rst: Line 88: +---------+ +---------+ outport +===========+ > Agree that it is better to clarify these points. Hi Cathy, I try to create multiple port-chains with the same port-pair-group, it failed. I think it is not allowed to do what you said, right? (neutron) port-chain-create --flow-classifier fc --port-pair-group pg1 pc1 Port Pair Group(s) [u'17c9a0a5-a38f-4a75-834e-9aa213cd431f'] in use by Port Chain f3af530f-210a-4c51-9a02-f1835d5b1d85. Neutron server returns request_ids: ['req-47e6a39b-677a-4ce3-9976-5dfcee0ac47f'] (neutron) Cathy> when a port pair group is shared by multiple chains, these chains should be different, which means these chains should consist of different sequences of port pair groups. For example, chain 1 consists of <port-pair-group1, port-pair-group2> and chain 2 consists of "port-pair-group1, port-pair-group3, port-pair-group4>. But if the two chains are the same, i.e. they consist of the same sequence of port-pair-groups (e.g. the two chains both consist of <port-pair-group1>), then it is not allowed since it does not make sense to create the same chain twice. Maybe your test scenario falls into the second case? -- To view, visit https://review.openstack.org/333172 To unsubscribe, visit https://review.openstack.org/settings Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I5c1827dcc81e48983a41120ec08983c571c5b2e9 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Project: openstack/networking-sfc Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Louis Fourie <louis.fou...@huawei.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Farhad Sunavala <fs...@yahoo.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Gerrit-Reviewer: John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Kyle Mestery <mest...@mestery.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Louis Fourie <louis.fou...@huawei.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Na Zhu <na...@cn.ibm.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Richard Theis <rth...@us.ibm.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Ryan Moats <rmo...@us.ibm.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Stephen Wong <stephen.kf.w...@gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: cathy <cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: vikram.choudhary <vikram.choudh...@huawei.com> Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
