On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov < vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Dear colleagues, > > I'd like to suggest to replace Fuel-ostf with Rally. Rally is quite > popular project and as far as I know it has all necessary features > (including dashboard). We only need to implement testing scenarios. > > In particular the suggestion is as follows > > 1) Implement necessary testing scenarios to achieve feature parity with > Fuel-ostf (including those which test Fuel HA features). > 2) Prepare necessary rpm/deb packages (Rally itself + scenarios) > 3) Modify Fuel-qa so it uses Rally instead of Fuel-ostf. > 4) Deprecate Fuel-ostf (including removal of ostf tab on UI). I'd prefer > Fuel users to rely on Rally user interface (both CLI and dashboard). > > What do you think? Are there any volunteers to implement this? > > I thought Rally was more for benchmarking. Wouldn't Tempest make more sense? -Alex > > Vladimir Kozhukalov > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
