On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Robert Collins <robe...@robertcollins.net> wrote:
> Removing the pbr branch should be fine - it was an exceptional thing > to have that branch in the first place - pbr is consumed by releases > only, and due to its place in the dependency graph is very very very > hard to pin or cap. > Based off this I have removed the stable/kilo branch from pbr. Cheers, Josh > > -Rob > > On 25 June 2016 at 12:37, Tony Breeds <t...@bakeyournoodle.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 04:36:03PM -0700, Sumit Naiksatam wrote: > >> Hi Tony, Thanks for your response, and no worries! We can live with > >> the kilo-eol tag, no need to try to delete it. And as you suggested, > >> we can add a second eol tag when we actually EoL this branch. > >> > >> As regards reviving the deleted branches, would a bug have to be > >> created somewhere to track this, or is this already on the radar of > >> the infra team (thanks in advance if it already is)? > > > > No bug needed. I'll work with the infra team to re-create the branch. > Just as > > a level set it wont be this weekend. > > > > Yours Tony. > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
