On 6/15/2016 3:10 PM, Paul Michali wrote:
Is the plan to back port that change to Mitaka?
Thanks,
PCM
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:31 PM Matt Riedemann
<mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com <mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote:
On 6/14/2016 3:09 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
> Yes. Code merged recently from Sahid does this:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/277422/
>
> Best,
> -jay
>
That was actually reverted out of mitaka:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292290/
The feature change that got into newton was this:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292499/
Which was busted, and required:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/324379/
Well, required as long as you want your compute service to start. :)
And no, we aren't backporting these, especially to liberty which is
security / critical fix mode only now.
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
No, it's really a feature.
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
