I just want to point out that this appears to imply that open source storage backends for OpenStack would be prioritized over closed-source ones and I think that runs counter to the general inclusivity in the community. I assume it¹s just a turn of phrase, but I suspect it could be easily misinterpreted to mean that open source storage projects (external to OpenStack) could be prioritized over open source ones, creating a very uneven playing field, which would potentially be very bad from a perception point of view.
Thanks, --Randy VP, Technology, EMC Corporation Top 10 OpenStack & Cloud Pioneer +1 (415) 787-2253 [google voice] TWITTER: twitter.com/randybias LINKEDIN: linkedin.com/in/randybias EXEC ADMIN: inna.k...@emc.com, +1 (415) 601-1168 On 5/10/16, 9:40 AM, "Matt Riedemann" <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >A closed-source vendor-specific ephemeral backend for a single virt >driver in Nova isn't a review priority for the release. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
