Hi Jay,

Posted here because you're probably sleeping now ;)

On 2016-05-31 7:01 PM, Jay Faulkner wrote:
Hi all,


During this cycle, on behalf of OSIC, I'll be working on implementing proper 
oslo.policy support for Ironic. The reasons this is needed probably don't need 
to be explained here, so I won't :).


I have two requests for the list regarding this though:


1) Is there a general guideline to follow when designing policy roles? There 
appears to have been some discussion around this already here: 
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/245629/, but it hasn't moved in over a month. 
I want Ironic's implementation of policy to be as 'standard' as possible; but 
I've had trouble finding any kind of standard.


I think the link you posted is specifically for standardizing what it should be. All of this seems very new, I suspect we will see guidelines appearing when common-default-policy lands.


2) A general call for contributors to help make this happen in Ironic. I want, 
in the next week, to finish up the research and start on a spec. Anyone willing 
to help with the design or implementation let me know here or in IRC so we can 
work together.


Willing to help with both.


Mathieu


Thanks in advance,

Jay Faulkner


P.S. Yes, I am aware of 
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/oslo-specs/specs/newton/policy-in-code.html
 and will ensure whatever Ironic does follows this specification.



__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to