The short answer is no. StackLight is based on Heka for log processing and parsing. Heka itself uses Lua Parsing Expression Grammars [1]. For now the patterns are maintained in the LMA collector repository [2] but it's on our to-do list to have it available in a dedicated repo. One advantage of having Lua-based parsing is that it's fairly easy to unit test the patterns. BR, Simon
[1] http://www.inf.puc-rio.br/~roberto/lpeg/lpeg.html [2] https://github.com/openstack/fuel-plugin-lma-collector/blob/master/deployment_scripts/puppet/modules/lma_collector/files/plugins/common/patterns.lua On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya <bdobre...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Hi. > Are there plans to align the StackLight (LMA plugin) [0] with that > recently announced source of Logstash filters [1]? I found no fast info > if the plugin supports Logstash input log shippers, so I'm just asking > as well. > > Writing grok filters is... hard, I'd had a sad experience [2] with that > some time ago, and that is not that I'd like to repeat or maintain on my > own, so writing those is something definitely should be done > collaboratively :) > > [0] https://launchpad.net/lma-toolchain > [1] https://github.com/openstack-infra/logstash-filters > [2] https://goo.gl/bG6EwX > -- > Best regards, > Bogdan Dobrelya, > Irc #bogdando > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
