On 12/05/16 18:21 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:


On 5/12/16 6:19 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:



   On 5/12/16 6:04 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:

       On 12/05/16 17:38 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:

           Comments, alternate proposal inline.



           On 5/12/16 8:35 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:

               On 2016-05-11 23:39:58 -0400 (-0400), Nikhil Komawar wrote:

                   I would like to propose adding add Brian to the team.

               [...]

               I'm thrilled to see Glance adding more security-minded
               reviewers for
               embargoed vulnerability reports! One thing to keep in mind
               though is
               that you need to keep the list of people with access to these
               relatively small; I see
               https://launchpad.net/~glance-coresec/+members has five members
               now.


           Thanks for raising this. Yes, we are worried about it too. But as
           you
           bring it up, it becomes even more important. A lot of Glancers time
           share with other projects and lack bandwidth to contribute fully to
           this
           responsibility. Currently, I do not know if anyone can be rotated
           out as
           we have had pretty good input from all the folks there.


               While the size I picked in item #2 at
               <URL: https://governance.openstack.org/reference/tags/
               vulnerability_managed.html#requirements >
               is not meant to be a strict limit, you may still want to take
               this
               as an opportunity to rotate out some of your less-active
               reviewers
               (if there are any).




           Thanks for not being strict on it.

           I do however, want to make another proposal:


           Since Stuart is our VMT liaison and he's on hiatus, can we add
           Brian as
           his substitute. As soon as Stuart is back and is ready to shoulder
           this
           responsibility we should do the rotation.

           Please vote +1, 0, -1.

           I will consider final votes by Thur May 19 2100 UTC.



       Can we ask Stuart if he's ok with us removing him from the coresec
       team? I think
       he won't have time for it and it'd be irresponsible from us to send VMT
       bugs to
       him at this point.



I just realized we both meant the same thing, my description wasn't too clear
though on what I meant as rotation.

Ah-ha! Gotcha! then +1 from me too :)



   Confirmation enqueue.


       Cheers,
       Flavio


       
__________________________________________________________________________
       OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
       Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
       http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


   --

   Thanks,
   Nikhil


--

Thanks,
Nikhil


--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to