Ben Swartzlander wrote:
On 05/05/2016 04:01 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Ben,
Have you seen this yet?
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/legal-discuss/2014-March/000201.html
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/15Oct2012BoardMinutes#Approval_of_the_CCBY_License_for_Documentation.
No I hadn't seen this. It's helpful to know that there is official
support from the board for using the CCBY license but it's unclear what
that's supposed to look like, since I can't find a single project that's
converted their whole specs repo to the new license.
My confusion comes from how to handle the existing Apache 2.0 stuff in
the cookie cutter. I can't just drop the Apache 2.0 license... The only
obvious path forward is to create a gross mess like the existing specs
repos have where there's a mix of the 2 licenses and it's not clear
which license applies to what.
Looks like a question/discussion for the legal-discuss ML.
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
