On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 02:35:46PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > This has been a lively thread, and the summit session was similarly > animated. I'm glad to see so much interest in managing our dependencies! > > As we discussed at the summit, my primary objective with dependency > management this cycle is actually to spin it out into its own team, like > we did with stable management over the last year. We discussed several > things that team might undertake, including reviewing all of our > existing dependencies to ensure they are all still actually needed; > reviewing any overlap between dependencies to try to remove items from > the list; and implementing some of the other changes we discussed such > as allowing overlapping ranges between the global and per-project lists.
I think some of these pro-active things will be key. A quick check shows we have nearly 30 items in g-r that don't seem to be used by anything. So there is some low hanging fruit there. Search for overlapping requirements and then working with the impacted teams is a big job but again a very worthwhile goal. > We had no volunteers to serve as PTL of that new team, I was only have joking when I said I can learn how to be a PTL in 2 things at the same time :) Regardless lets try to grow a team from the volunteers then we can decide what the spin off looks like. Yours Tony.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
