Could we kindly stop discussing radosgw at this moment? On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > Fox, Kevin M wrote: >> >> RadosGW has been excluded from joining the OpenStack community in part due >> to its use of c++. > > > I'm not sure I'd use the word "excluded" since RadosGW was never actually > proposed. Maybe our past Python-centricity discouraged them to apply, but > that's conjecture. > >> Now that we're talking about alternate languages, that may be on the table >> now? > > > It's been a possibility for the last 8 months. > > That said, my personal view is that we should accept additional languages > when the current set of accepted languages is suboptimal for something we > want to write or create. A technical benefit to outweigh the community > fragmentation and increase in infrastructure tasks that result from adding > that language. > > I'm less convinced that we should add a language for the sole benefit of > being able to absorb an existing project into OpenStack which happens to be > written in a specific language. Especially if the then-supported set of > languages could provide the same technical benefits. > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-- Email: shin...@linux.com shin...@redhat.com __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
