On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 6:38 AM Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Here's a summary of Puppet OpenStack sessions [1] during Austin summit. > > * General feedback is excellent, things are stable, no major changes > are coming during the next cycle. > * We discussed about the work we want to do during Newton cycle [2]: > > Ubuntu 16.04 LTS > Make Puppet OpenStack modules working and gated on Ubuntu 16.04, > starting from Newton. > Keep stable/mitaka and before gated on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. > > Release management with trailing cycle > The release model changed to: > http://governance.openstack.org/reference/tags/release_cycle-trailing.html > We'll start producing milestones within a cycle, continue efforts on > tarballs and investigate package builds (rpm, etc). > We spoke some about marking point releases more often. On stable it sounded like everyone was in favor for this to be automated. I didn't catch how we wanted to handle dev milestones > > Move documentation out from Wiki > See [3]. > > puppet-pacemaker unification > Mirantis & Red Hat to continue collaboration on merging efforts on > puppet-pacemaker module: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/296440/) > So both Fuel & TripleO will use the same Puppet module to deploy Pacemaker. > > CI stabilization > We're supporting 18 months old releases, so we will continue all > efforts to stabilize our CI and make it robust so it does not break > every morning. Does this make it the last 3 releases + dev = 4 or the last 2 + dev? Since -3 technically falls off when the next dev cycle starts > > Containers > Most of containers deployments have common bits (user/group > management, config files management, etc). > We decided that we would add the common bits in our modules, so they > can be used by people deploying OpenStack in containers. See [4]. > > [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-design-puppet > [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-puppet-project-status > [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-puppet-docs > [4] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-puppet-multinode-containers > > > As a retrospective, we've noticed that we had a quiet agenda & > sessions this time, without critical things. It is a sign for our > group things are now very stable and we did an excellent job to be at > this point. > Thanks for everyone who attended our sessions, feel free to add more > things that I might have missed, or any questions. > -- > Emilien Macchi > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- -- Andrew Woodward Mirantis Fuel Community Ambassador Ceph Community
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
