On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Duncan Thomas <duncan.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 20 April 2016 at 08:08, koshiya maho <koshiya.m...@po.ntts.co.jp> > wrote: > > >> This design was discussed, reviewed and approved in cross-projects [1] and >> already implemented in nova, cinder and neutron. >> At this point if we change the implementation then it will not be >> consistent across core OpenStack projects. >> For maintenance of the whole of OpenStack, I think that the present >> method is best. >> Please suggest. >> > > I haven't been asking for a complete redesign. I just want this to be opt-in to minimize the chance of an impact on existing applications. We can eventually deprecate the old behavior. - Brant > The fact that a cross-project spec is approved doesn't mean that it will > end up being practical. If the cinder-client implementation had been found > to break any none-trivial users then I wouldn't have hesitated. > > Cross project specs are not getting massive amounts of detailed attention > from project teams, end even they were it is not possible to foresee all > subtle problems at review time - they should be taken as guidance not > gospel and expect to be reworked if it proves necessary. > > -- > Duncan Thomas >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
