On 19/04/16 18:04, Steve Baker wrote:
On 19/04/16 20:29, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 04:24:46PM +1200, Steve Baker wrote:
All of the TripleO design summit sessions are on Thursday afternoon in
slots which clash with Heat sessions. Heat is a core component of TripleO
and as a contributor to both projects I was rather hoping to attend as
many of both sessions as possible - I don't think I'm alone in this
desire.
Is it possible that some horse trading could take place to reduce the
clashes? Maybe TripleO sessions could move to Wednesday morning?
Yes I agree this is unfortunate. I already queried the clashes wrt the
contributor meetups, and was told we can only adjust if we can find another
project willing to switch - I'm Open to negotiation if any other PTLs wish
to change sessions at this late stage.
I see the current Heat schedule has SoftwareDeployment improvements [1] and
Issues with very large stacks [2] at non-conflicting times, which is good
as these are probably amongst the top priorities for TripleO (other than
performance improvements, which relates to very-large-stacks).
One observation I would make is that Heat does have a pretty large number
of sessions (12 in total plus meetup), this is always going to present
challenges from a scheduling point of view - perhaps we can ask for a
volunteer or two (other than myself) from the Heat community who is willing
to cover at least the Upgrades fishbowl[3] and Composable Services
workroom[4] sessions if we can't resolve the conflicts.
Thanks,
Steve
[1]https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/9115
[2]https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/9117
[3]https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/9118
[4]https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/9292
I think we could reduce the topic overlap just by shuffling the heat
sessions.
Thomas, what do you think of the following?
Swap work sessions "Release model and versioning" and "Validation
improvements"
https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/9240
https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/9247
This would let me attend the tripleo CI work session, and the release
model session which I proposed ;)
I'm driving the validation improvements session, but I don't care about
the conflicting TripleO session "Reducing the CI pain" so that's OK.
Swap work sessions "Performance improvements" and "hot-parser"
https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/9236
https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/9248
I think this is a no-go because it would put the hot-parser session on
at the same time as the Tacker/heat-translator joint session that will
necessarily have a bunch of the same people in it.
This will make the performance work session before the performance
fishbowl, but I'm sure we could make that work. Its not like we need the
fishbowl to solicit areas of improvement.
Umm, I thought that was the idea.
I need to be at both of those Heat ones anyway, so this doesn't really
help me. I'd rather have the DLM session in this slot instead. (The only
sessions I can really skip are the Release Model, Functional Tests and
DLM.) That would give us:
Heat TripleO
Wed 3:30 Release Model
Wed 4:30 HOT Parser
Wed 5:20 Functional Tests
Thu 1:30 DLM Upgrades
Thu 2:20 Convergence switchover Containers
Thu 3:10 Convergence cleanup Composable Roles
Thu 4:10 Performance API
Thu 5:00 Validation CI
I think that way Steve and I could probably both cover upgrades, and he
could cover the rest.
I'd like to get to the composable roles and containers sessions too, but
we'd have to rejig basically every Heat session and I think it's too
late to be doing that.
cheers,
Zane.
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
