On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Sagi Shnaidman <[email protected]> wrote:
> For making clear all advantages and disadvantages, I've created a doc: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HmY-I8OzoJt0SzLzs79hCa1smKGltb-byrJOkKKGXII/edit?usp=sharing > > Please comment. > > On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Sagi Shnaidman <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> John raised up the issue - where should we take tempest sources from. >> I'm not sure where to take them from, so I bring it to wider discussion. >> >> Right now I use tempest from delorean packages. In comparison with >> original tempest I don't see any difference in tests, only additional >> configuration scripts: >> https://github.com/openstack/tempest/compare/master...redhat-openstack:master >> It's worth to mention that in case of delorean tempest the configuration >> scripts fit tempest tests configuration, however in case of original >> tempest repo it's required to change them and maintain according to very >> dynamical configuration. >> >> So, do we need to use pure upstream tempest from current source and to >> maintain configuration scripts or we can use packaged from delorean and not >> duplicate effort of test teams? >> >> Thanks >> -- >> Best regards >> Sagi Shnaidman >> > > > > -- > Best regards > Sagi Shnaidman > Hrm.. can't we use upstream tempest and the midstream configure script that will be checked into tripleo upstream repos? I don't think we need to make the choice you are proposing.
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
