Hi >From: Yuiko Takada [mailto:yuikotakada0...@gmail.com] > >I've summarized all of related proposals. >
Thanks for your summary, Yuiko Takada. It is great. I want to give you some more comments as below. >(4)Add Ironic-ipmiproxy server >https://review.openstack.org/#/c/296869/ > >* Pros: >- There is no influence to other components >- Output log file >- IPMIShellinaboxConsole will be also available via Horizon > >* Cons: >- Need IPMIShellinaboxConsole changes? >- Need to bump API microversion/RPC * Pros: - There is no influence to other components - Output log file - IPMIShellinaboxConsole will be also available via Horizon (backward compatibility) - The proxy can serve across Ironic conductors (in case of multiple conductors) * Cons: - Need IPMIShellinaboxConsole changes (only add some code, no change the existing behaviors of it) - Need to bump API microversion/RPC For other specs, currently I don't have any comment due to the Yuiko Takada's summary is very detailed. Best regards, Dao Cong Tien > > >From: Yuiko Takada [mailto:yuikotakada0...@gmail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 3:47 PM >To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][nova][horizon] Serial console support >for ironic instances > >Hi, > >I also want to discuss about it at summit session. > >2016-04-13 0:41 GMT+09:00 Ruby Loo <rlooya...@gmail.com>: >Yes, I think it would be good to have a summit session on that. However, >before the session, it would really be helpful if the folks with proposals got >together and/or reviewed each other's proposals, and summarized their >findings. > >I've summarized all of related proposals. > >(1)Add driver using Socat >https://review.openstack.org/#/c/293827/ > >* Pros: >- There is no influence to other components >- Don't need to change any other Ironic drivers(like IPMIShellinaboxConsole) >- Don't need to bump API microversion/RPC > >* Cons: >- Don't output log file > >(2)Add driver starting ironic-console-server >https://review.openstack.org/#/c/302291/ >(There is no spec, yet) > >* Pros: >- There is no influence to other components >- Output log file >- Don't need to change any other Ironic drivers(like IPMIShellinaboxConsole) >- No adding any Ironic services required, only add tools > >* Cons: >- Need to bump API microversion/RPC > >(3)Add a custom HTTP proxy to Nova >https://review.openstack.org/#/c/300582/ > >* Pros: >- Don't need any change to Ironic API > >* Cons: >- Need Nova API changes(bump microversion) >- Need Horizon changes >- Don't output log file > >(4)Add Ironic-ipmiproxy server >https://review.openstack.org/#/c/296869/ > >* Pros: >- There is no influence to other components >- Output log file >- IPMIShellinaboxConsole will be also available via Horizon > >* Cons: >- Need IPMIShellinaboxConsole changes? >- Need to bump API microversion/RPC > >If there is any mistake, please give me comment. > > >Best Regards, >Yuiko Takada > >2016-04-13 0:41 GMT+09:00 Ruby Loo <rlooya...@gmail.com>: >Yes, I think it would be good to have a summit session on that. However, >before the session, it would really be helpful if the folks with proposals got >together and/or reviewed each other's proposals, and summarized their >findings. You may find after reviewing the proposals, that eg only 2 are >really different. Or they several have merit because they are addressing >slightly different issues. That would make it easier to present/discuss/decide >at the session. > >--ruby > > >On 12 April 2016 at 09:17, Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> wrote: >On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:02:44AM +0800, Zhenguo Niu wrote: >> Maybe we can continue the discussion here, as there's no enough time in the >> irc meeting :) > >Someone mentioned this would make a good summit session, as there's a >few competing proposals that are all good options. I do welcome >discussion here until then, but I'm going to put it on the schedule. :) > >// jim > >> >> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Zhenguo Niu <niu.zgli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> > Ironic is currently using shellinabox to provide a serial console, but >> > it's not compatible >> > with nova, so I would like to propose a new console type and a custom HTTP >> > proxy [1] >> > which validate token and connect to ironic console from nova. >> > >> > On Horizon side, we should add support for the new console type [2] as >> > well, here are some screenshots from my local environment. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Additionally, shellinabox console ports management should be improved in >> > ironic, instead of manually specified, we should introduce dynamically >> > allocation/deallocation [3] mechanism. >> > >> > Functionality is being implemented in Nova, Horizon and Ironic: >> > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/shellinabox-http-proxy >> > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/ironic-shellinabox-console >> > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:bug/1526371 >> > >> > >> > PS: to achieve this goal, we can also add a new console driver in ironic >> > [4], but I think it doesn't conflict with this, as shellinabox is capable >> > to integrate with nova, and we should support all console drivers. >> > >> > >> > [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/shellinabox-http-proxy >> > [2] >> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/ironic-shellinabox-console >> > [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1526371 >> > [4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1553083 >> > >> > -- >> > Best Regards, >> > Zhenguo Niu >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> Zhenguo Niu > > > > >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > >__________________________________________________________________________ >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > >__________________________________________________________________________ >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
