> > Increase the commit requirements, but don't remove the summit pass > > perk. You'll add a barrier for ATCs and see fewer of them at > > summits. > > The commit counts for the latest TC electorate show 27% had only one > merged change in Gerrit during the qualifying one year period. It's > worth keeping in mind that for recent summits only the current > cycle's contributions were taken into account for free passes > though, rather than a full year, so it's possibly more telling that > 40% of the electorate had only 1 or 2 qualifying commits (the bare > minimum to get free conference registration for Liberty, Mitaka or > both). > > A basic regression analysis of the owner totals for 3 through 50 > changes closely fits a power curve of 857.39*x^-1.239 and comes
Thanks Jeremy for doing the analysis, that model curve just begs to be graphed :) /E > within 3.3% of predicting how many of the electorate have only one > change, but falls 15% short of predicting those with two. That said, > the deviation only means an additional 94 more contributors who had > one or two changes than the model predicts there should be, so I > don't think there's a strong enough correlation with the limited > data we have to say for sure that free summit passes result in a > significant bloat in electorate size (certainly a lot less of one > than I expected anyway). > -- > Jeremy Stanley > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
