Armando M. wrote: > I would like to understand if these need new owners (both assignees and > approvers). Code submitted [5,6] has not been touched in a while, and > whilst I appreciate people have been busy focussing on Mitaka (myself > included), the Newton master branch has been open for a while. > > With this email I would like to appeal to the people in CC to report back > their interest in continuing working on these items in their respective > capacities, and/or the wider community, in case new owners need to be > identified.
My involvement in the FwaaS project has been reduced significantly over the past couple of months, and I think because of this, someone should probably step in and replace me. I would like to apologize for my failure, because I advocated publicly for using the FwaaS API as the vehicle for more granular and more advanced packet filtering features, as opposed to extending the security group API. It is a failure on my part to advocate for a solution, then not be able to deliver the required work. I am sorry for this, truly. -- Sean M. Collins __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
