+1 to demand meetings and asynchronous way On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Ildikó Váncsa <ildiko.van...@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Hi Gordon, > > > > > ie. the new PTL should checkpoint with subteam leads regularly to review > spec status or identify missing resources on high-priority > > items? > > I would say anything that we feel as useful information to people who read > this mailing list. In this sense features that got implemented, items we > are focusing on, as you mentioned resource bottlenecks on important items, > etc. > > > > > as some feedback, re: news flash mails, we need a way to promote roadmap > backlog items better. i'm not sure anyone looks at Road > > Map page... > > maybe we need to organise it better with priority and incentive. > > I had the Roadmap page in mind as well partially, we could highlight the > plans/tasks from that page and also track progress. > > Thanks, > /Ildikó > > > > > On 31/03/2016 7:14 AM, Ildikó Váncsa wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > +1 on the on demand meeting schedule. Maybe we can also have some news > flash mails week to summarize the progress in our > > sub-modules when we don't have the meeting. Just to keep people up to > date. > > > > > > Will we already skip the today's meeting? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > /Ildikó > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Julien Danjou [mailto:jul...@danjou.info] > > >> Sent: March 31, 2016 11:04 > > >> To: liusheng > > >> Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Rescheduling IRC meetings > > >> > > >> On Thu, Mar 31 2016, liusheng wrote: > > >> > > >>> Another personal suggestion: > > >>> > > >>> maybe we can have a weekly routine mail thread to present the things > > >>> need to be discussed or need to be notified. The mail will also list > > >>> the topics posted in meeting agenda and ask to Telemetry folks if a > > >>> online IRC meeting is necessary, if there are a very few topics or > > >>> low priority topics, or the topics can be suitably discussed > > >>> asynchronously, we can disuccs them in the mail thread. > > >>> > > >>> any thoughts? > > >> > > >> Yeah I think it's more or less the same idea that was proposed, > > >> schedule a meeting only if needed. I'm going to amend the meeting > wiki page with that! > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Julien Danjou > > >> -- Free Software hacker > > >> -- https://julien.danjou.info > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > > Unsubscribe: > > > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > > > -- > > gord > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
