Excerpts from Julia Kreger's message of 2016-04-01 18:21:24 -0400: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote: > > > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2016-04-01 16:25:07 -0400: > > > Ironic/Bifrost team, > > > > > > > > > It would be good to understand what your intent is for builds. Can > > > you follow up here on this thread with some details? > > > > > > > First time partial user of the deliverables release tagging and didn't > realize that we were > missing the configuration necessary to push a tag up to tarballs.o.o. Would > landing > 300646 and then reverting it after 300474 has landed result in the > artifacts being built > and pushed to tarballs.o.o?
The tarball job is triggered when a new tag is added, so no. Now that the correct jobs are in place you could apply a new tag to produce an artifact, though. If you re-tag the same SHA as 1.0.0 with version 1.0.1, we will at least have that. We can decide what to do about the missing artifacts separately (either remove them from the record or disable the links to those versions). You can either tag directly and then record the results in the releases repo, or you can submit a release request and let the release team process it. Doug > > > > > I forgot to mention that https://review.openstack.org/#/c/300474 > > includes some changes to add the simple server publishing jobs. If you > > want to use those, please +1 the patch. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
