Agreed this needs to happen +1, ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Peeler" <[email protected]> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 1:22:31 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Just make Mitaka deploy Liberty within the Liberty branch
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Jeffrey Zhang <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 12:29 AM > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Just make Mitaka deploy Liberty > within the Liberty branch > > +1 > > A lot of changes has been make in Mitaka. Backport is difficult. > > But using Mitaka deploy Liberty also has *much works*. For example, > revert config file change which deprecated in Mitaka and Liberty support. > > A important one is the `keystone-manage bootstrap` command to create the > keystone admin account. This is adderecently and only exist in the Mitaka > branch. So when using this method, we should revert some commit and use > the old way method. > > > Agreed. I'm sure there will be some checking and such once all the code has been shuffled around, but I think doing this work is better than abandoning a branch. So +1 to proposal. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
