+1
On 25/03/16 15:36, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
Hey folks,
These branches are essentially unmaintained and we have completely given
up on them. That’s ok – they were paths of our development. I didn't
really want to branch them in the first place, but the community
demanded it, so I delivered that :)
Now that our architecture is fairly stable in liberty and mitaka, I
think it makes sense to do the following
1.. tag each of the above branches with icehosue-eol, juno-eol, kilo-eol
2. Ask infrastructure to remove the branches from git
This is possible; I have just verified in openstack-infra. I'd like a
vote from the core review team. If you would like to see the kilo
branch stay, please note that, and if there is a majority on
icehosue/juno but not kilo I'll make the appropriate arrangements with
openstack-infra.
I will leave voting open for 1 week until Saturday April 2nd. I will
close voting early if there is a majority vote.
Regards
-steve
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
