Guys, Fuel has own implementation of pacemaker [1]. It's functionality may be useful in other projects.
[1] https://github.com/fuel-infra/puppet-pacemaker -- Best regards, Sergii Golovatiuk, Skype #golserge IRC #holser On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 6:20 AM, Emilien Macchi <emilien.mac...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Feb 12, 2016 11:06 PM, "Spencer Krum" <n...@spencerkrum.com> wrote: > > > > The module would also be welcome under the voxpupuli[0] namespace on > > github. We currently have a puppet-corosync[1] module, and there is some > > overlap there, but a pure pacemaker module would be a welcome addition. > > > > I'm not sure which I would prefer, just that VP is an option. For > > greater openstack integration, gerrit is the way to go. For greater > > participation from the wider puppet community, github is the way to go. > > Voxpupuli provides testing and releasing infrastructure. > > The thing is, we might want to gate it on tripleo since it's the first > consumer right now. Though I agree VP would be a good place too, to attract > more puppet users. > > Dilemma! > Maybe we could start using VP, with good testing and see how it works. > > Iterate later if needed. Thoughts? > > > > > [0] https://voxpupuli.org/ > > [1] https://github.com/voxpupuli/puppet-corosync > > > > -- > > Spencer Krum > > n...@spencerkrum.com > > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016, at 09:44 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > Please look and vote: > > > https://review.openstack.org/279698 > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your feedback! > > > > > > On 02/10/2016 04:04 AM, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote: > > > > I like the idea of moving it to use the OpenStack infrastructure. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Ben Nemec <openst...@nemebean.com > > > > <mailto:openst...@nemebean.com>> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 02/09/2016 08:05 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > TripleO is currently using puppet-pacemaker [1] which is a > module > > > > hosted > > > > > & managed by Github. > > > > > The module was created and mainly maintained by Redhat. It > tends to > > > > > break TripleO quite often since we don't have any gate. > > > > > > > > > > I propose to move the module to OpenStack so we'll use > OpenStack Infra > > > > > benefits (Gerrit, Releases, Gating, etc). Another idea would > be to > > > > gate > > > > > the module with TripleO HA jobs. > > > > > > > > > > The question is, under which umbrella put the module? Puppet ? > > > > TripleO ? > > > > > > > > > > Or no umbrella, like puppet-ceph. <-- I like this idea > > > > > > > > > > > > I think the module not being under an umbrella makes sense. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any feedback is welcome, > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/redhat-openstack/puppet-pacemaker > > > > > > > > Seems like a module that would be useful outside of TripleO, so > it > > > > doesn't seem like it should live under that. Other than that I > don't > > > > have enough knowledge of the organization of the puppet modules > to > > > > comment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > > > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > > > Unsubscribe: > > > > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > > > > < > http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe> > > > > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Juan Antonio Osorio R. > > > > e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com <mailto:jaosor...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > > > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > > > Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > > > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Emilien Macchi > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > > Unsubscribe: > > > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > Email had 1 attachment: > > > + signature.asc > > > 1k (application/pgp-signature) > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
