On 3 March 2016 at 12:05, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Neutrinos,
>
> Mitaka-3 is out [1] and we should be focussing on rc1. This is the time
> where we switch gear:
>
>    - Test M-3, find issues and target them for RC1 [2];
>    - Apply/agree for FFE status for pending features on the postmortem
>    [3];
>    - For features that get FFE granted, I'll be moving targeting them to
>    RC1. Those that get denied will be pushed back to N as soon as it opens up.
>    - Be mindful of the gate. Watch its state and make sure that you
>    approve/merge only changes that are targeted for RC1. Anything else should
>    be pushed back, especially trivial, and cosmetic fixes.
>    - RC1 is for critical and high bug fixes (release blockers or gate
>    failures) and FFE changes only. Anything else should be left untargeted.
>    - Remember to tie loose ends, testing and docs are paramount to allow
>    our users to enjoy our new features reliably.
>
> When in doubt, reach out!
>

You have one more day to comment/provide feedback on [1], before we close
Mitaka for good. Some items still miss documentation (not even as a patch
up for review). For this reason, they will be marked incomplete for Mitaka.
An example is Flavors [2]. If I got it wrong, please let me know.

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/286413/
[2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/neutron-flavor-framework


>
> Cheers,
> Armando
>
> [1] https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/mitaka-3
> [2] https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/mitaka-rc1
> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/286413/
>
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to