On 3 March 2016 at 07:52, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: > On 03/02/2016 01:46 PM, Armando M. wrote: > <snip> > > IMO, I think that's a loophole that should be closed. We should all > > strive to make OpenStack clouds behave alike. > > It might be a loophole. But it's also data. People are doing that thing > for a reason based on customer feedback. If the general norms are that > this is allowed, and OpenStack clouds do the opposite, they will be > considered broken compared to the norms. >
Not the customers I've spoken with. I'm OK with doing something different to RAX, in fact some people might consider RAX to be broken when they see it different from us. I'm not keen on any cloud being considered 'broken' because of an implementation detail, and every cloud has some level of differences. Just take a look at os_client_config to see some of the differences (and the ways to make that easier). > > -Sean > > -- > Sean Dague > http://dague.net > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
