On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Nikhil Komawar <nik.koma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here are a few ideas that I've in mind (more than 6 for now) for the > workroom sessions (of course that can be prioritized): > > 1. Import refactor > 2. Glare > 3. Quotas > 4. State of Image sharing, community images, Hierarchical Images etc. > 5. glance_store improvements, general gate jobs discussions, releases > discussions, logging, notification etc. > 6. First hand & closed loop dedicated operator, superuser, general user, > experience, etc. feedback > 7. Feedback into the team from other projects, cross projects, general > workflow, etc. changes > 8. Priorities discussions > Thing is that most of what's going to be discussed is dictated by the priorities themselves. We have a rough idea of what the priorities for Newton are. I think the list you provided is good but it still doesn't seem to require an extra workroom for us (considering we have 3 fishbowl sessions too). Flavio > > I think we can utilize the contributors meetup for some of them but all of > them potentially involve folks who may not necessarily be first level > contributors to Glance or at all (in case they want to attend other > meetup). Also, asking for 8 (or more than 6) would be ill effect against > being good openstack citizens. > > > On 2/24/16 12:25 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Nikhil Komawar < <nik.koma...@gmail.com> > nik.koma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Can we make it ? : >> >> FB 3 >> W 6 >> C 2 >> >> > > Could you elaborate on why you think we need 6 workroom sessions? > > Back in Tokyo, 5 seemed more than enough and there will be more projects > to host in Austin. > > Cheers, > Flavio > > >> >> On 2/24/16 10:42 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: >> >> Hey Folks, >> >> It's that time of the year. We need to choose what our needs with regards >> to slots and sessions are for the next summit. >> >> We can choose among 3 different types of sessions: >> >> * Fishbowl slots (Wed-Thu) >> Our traditional largish rooms organized in fishbowl style, with >> advertised session content on the summit schedule for increased external >> participation. Ideal for when wider feedback is essential. >> >> * Workroom slots (Tue-Thu) >> Smaller rooms organized in boardroom style, with topic buried in the >> session description, in an effort to limit attendance and not overcrowd >> the room. Ideal to get work done and prioritize work in small teams. >> >> * Contributors meetup (Fri) >> Half-day session(s) on the Friday to get into the Newton action while >> decisions and plans are still hot, or to finish discussions started >> during the week, whatever works for you. >> >> Our usage in Tokyo was: 3, 5, 2 >> >> I'd recommend we keep it that way. Thoughts? >> Cheers, >> Flavio >> >> -- >> @flaper87 >> Flavio Percoco >> >> >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribehttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> >> -- >> >> Thanks, >> Nikhil >> >> > > > -- > @flaper87 > Flavio Percoco > > > -- > > Thanks, > Nikhil > > -- @flaper87 Flavio Percoco
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
