> On 22 Feb 2016, at 17:45, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > > Amrith Kumar wrote: >> [...] >> As a result of this proposal, there will still be four events each year, two >> "OpenStack Summit" events and two "MidCycle" events. > > Actually, the OpenStack summit becomes the midcycle event. The new separated > contributors-oriented event[tm] happens at the beginning of the new cycle.
So in general a well thought out proposal - and it certainly helps address some of the early concerns over a “simplistic” split. I was also worrying, however, about the reduction in developer face time - it wasn’t immediate clear that the main summit could be treated as a developer midcycle. Is the idea that we just let this be informally organized by the projects, or tha there would at least be room set aside for each project (but without all the formal cross-project structure/agenda that there is in a main developer summit)? >> [...] >> Given the number of projects, and leaving aside high bandwidth internet and >> remote participation, providing dedicated meeting room for the duration of >> the MidCycle event for each project is a considerable undertaking. I believe >> therefore that the consequence is that the MidCycle event will end up being >> of comparable scale to the current Design Summit or larger, and will likely >> need a similar venue. > > It still is an order of magnitude smaller than the "OpenStack Summit". Think > 600 people instead of 6000. The idea behind co-hosting is to facilitate > cross-project interactions. You know where to find people, and you can easily > arrange a meeting between two teams for an hour. > >> [...] >> At the current OpenStack Summit, there is an opportunity for contributors, >> customers and operators to interact, not just in technical meetings, but >> also in a social setting. I think this is valuable, even though there seems >> to be a number of people who believe that this is not necessarily the case. > > I don't think the proposal removes that opportunity. Contributors /can/ still > go to OpenStack Summits. They just don't /have to/. I just don't think every > contributor needs to be present at every OpenStack Summit, while I'd like to > see most of them present at every separated contributors-oriented event[tm]. > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
