On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > So, Zane and I have discussed $subject and it was suggested I take this to > the list to reach consensus. > > Recently, I've run into a couple of small but inconvenient limitations in > our intrinsic function implementations, specifically for str_replace and > repeat, both of which did not behave the way I expected when referencing > things via get_param/get_attr:
Disclaimer: compatibility is not black and white, especially in these cases. We need to make decisions based on the impact we can imagine on users, so it's certainly subjective. That said: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1539737 I think it works fine as a bug fix. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1546684 I agree that a new version would be better. The main difference for me is that even if it's arguable, you could build a working template relying on the current behavior (having a template returned by a function). If you find a way to keep the current behavior *and* have the one you expect, then I can see it as a bug fix. -- Thomas __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
