On 02/17/2016 03:10 AM, Sean M. Collins wrote: > Thomas Goirand wrote: >> s/I dislike/is not free software/ [*] >> >> It's not a mater of taste. Having Poppy requiring a non-free component, >> even indirectly (ie: the Oracle JVM that CassandraDB needs), makes it >> non-free. > > Your definition of non-free versus free, if I am not mistaken, is > based on GPLv3. OpenStack is not GPL licensed
This has nothing to do with the GPL license. Where did you get this from? IMO, you really are, mistaking. > I understand and respect the point of view of the Debian project on > this, however OpenStack is an Apache licensed project. So, this is > entirely your bikeshed. > >> Ensuring we really only accept free software is not a bikeshed color >> discussion, it is really important. And that's the same topic as using >> non-free CDN solution (see below). > > It is a bikeshed, because you are injecting a debate over the freedoms of > Apache license vs. GPLv3 into this discussion. I have no idea where this comes from. > Which you do, on many > occasions. I respect this, but at some point it does hijack the original > intent of the thread. Which is now happening. I have *never* discussed Apache vs GPLv3, neither in this list or elsewhere. So I really don't understand why you're writing this. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
