-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 02/15/2016 03:27 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
> - can we have the feature optional for operators One thing that concerns me is the lesson learned from simply having a compute node's instance information sent and persisted in memory. That was resisted by several large operators, due to overhead. This proposal will have to store that and more in memory. - -- - -- Ed Leafe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWwdpaAAoJEKMgtcocwZqL7AsP/2/NqRtyepV/vmf7AMR/aI4P sKKdD5tT3dydvNZnsvSRWTkzTfvSPQqXSEOPfbMsdAcNGFerRMQ+gz4CTq9Jioa4 4Q7H3k4BgMucCOq8ZScUHLb4Ymw2A2ksXYqVIk4BALH3H0i/V+M6XMXQC7mFLSS2 Y8wqdPfb5qIvR4Zf90XPi1wkQiL0rx3WLpN6wHYovaJS7rxMfOT8/ZoO5s/zs5FM n9n+qcB0aMY4RT4+8J49homw1+hatPmo0lp4Hcyp7cCg1cvUidIXDDqw6ycMKRio mKMthiNT01kCG1mSRd9U3aszXnovGqGspl7K1R1SBt+4kiHIXQ4khiTDSnNuxnk+ 3GnM3gL72ZjVcppDReII9KpJ9ZPxhD4tKNsRfcZQrEjQCwGz5tY275FItyVypw1x tVLIsPzPbqFV/AjubPVChmypWsnG3bZT4eoCK0k8stRd5SArfR61Z20ai4r1fqWO 1HU6kT1iYCwhMUk58Om35e/G1a/4t/ZiSvdzS1NermD6SGh0oMmRYgQs7nSRMZ5Y pOIDLToVN/AnSxpgNgqsOpgLXRn3vCskrqxJqqcLiwEQnkh10gEnEvZ6gPAXOJLl axctk4jEbKLdNoEwEXuiAFJjGlNG/8J5J3T9CHbFRuUVDKZfcgKZc4l49pTYa8iA OiKK4a6Fw2UWbAdBTuCD =sxd3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
