On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrac...@redhat.com> wrote: > Eoghan Glynn <egl...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> >>>> [...] >>>> * much of the problem with the lavish parties is IMO related to the >>>> *exclusivity* of certain shindigs, as opposed to devs socializing at >>>> summit being inappropriate per se. In that vein, I think the cores >>>> party sends the wrong message and has run its course, while the TC >>>> dinner ... well, maybe Austin is the time to show some leadership >>>> on that? ;) >>> >>> >>> Well, Tokyo was the time to show some leadership on that -- there was no >>> "TC dinner" there :) >> >> >> Excellent, that is/was indeed a positive step :) >> >> For the cores party, much as I enjoyed the First Nation cuisine in >> Vancouver >> or the performance art in Tokyo, IMO it's probably time to draw a line >> under >> that excess also, as it too projects a notion of exclusivity that runs >> counter >> to building a community. > > > A lot of people I care about ignore the core reviewer party for those exact > reasons: because it’s too elitist and divisive. I agree with them, and I > ignore the party. I suggest everyone does the same.
I 'boycott' (Kind of a strong word since nobody cares in the first place) the core party for the same reasons. > > Ihar > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
