Hi all, We discussed this in our meeting[1] this week, and agreed a ML discussion to gain consensus and give folks visibility of the outcome would be a good idea.
In summary, we adopted a more permissive "release branch" policy[2] for our stable/liberty branches, where feature backports would be allowed, provided they worked with liberty and didn't break backwards compatibility. The original idea was really to provide a mechanism to "catch up" where features are added e.g to liberty OpenStack components late in the cycle and TripleO requires changes to integrate with them. However, the reality has been that the permissive backport policy has been somewhat abused (IMHO) with a large number of major features being proposed for backport, and in a few cases this has broken downstream (RDO) consumers of TripleO. Thus, I would propose that from Mitaka, we revise our backport policy to simply align with the standard stable branch model observed by all projects[3]. Hopefully this will allow us to retain the benefits of the stable branch process, but provide better stability for downstream consumers of these branches, and minimise confusion regarding what is a permissable backport. If we do this, only backports that can reasonably be considered "Appropriate fixes"[4] will be valid backports - in the majority of cases this will mean bugfixes only, and large features where the risk of regression is significant will not be allowed. What are peoples thoughts on this? Thanks, Steve [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2016/tripleo.2016-02-09-14.01.log.html [2] https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-specs/blob/master/specs/liberty/release-branch.rst [3] http://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html [4] http://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#appropriate-fixes __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev