On 02/08/2016 10:29 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/08/2016 10:07 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Brian Curtin wrote:
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote:
I would love to see the OpenStack contributor community take back the
design
summit to its original format and purpose and decouple it from the
OpenStack
Summit's conference portion.

I believe the design summits should be organized by the OpenStack
contributor community, not the OpenStack Foundation and its marketing
and
event planning staff.

As someone who spent years organizing PyCon as a volunteer from the
Python community, with four of those years in a row taking about 8
solid months of pre-conference effort, not to mention the on-site
effort to run a volunteer conference of that size [0]...I would
suggest even longer and harder thought before stretching a community
like this even more thinly. Things should change, but probably not the
"who's doing the work" aspect.

Beyond stretching out the community, we would end up with the same
problem we are trying to solve. Most of the cross-project folks that
would end up organizing the event would be too busy organizing the event
to be able to fully participate in it.

Right, this is a super key point. Even just organizing and running local
user groups, I know how much time is spent making sure the whole thing
seems effortless to attendees, and they can just focus on content.

Even look at the recently run Nova midcycle, with 40ish folks, it still
required some substantial logistics to pull off. The HPE team did a
great job with that. But it definitely required real time and effort.

Agreed.

The Foundation has done an amazing job of making everyone think this is
easy (I know how much it is not). Without their efforts organizing these
events, eliminating the distractions of wandering in a strange city to
find lunch, having a network, projectors, access to facilities,
appropriate sized spaces, double checking all those things will really
actually be there, chasing after folks when they are not, handling the
myriad of other unforseen issues that you never have to see.... we would
not be nearly as productive at the design summits.

I understand this. I ran the MySQL Users Conference and Expo for 2 years. I realize the amount of effort it takes to organize a 2500+ person event. It's essentially a full-time job.

I suppose I should have used a different wording. What I really think should happen is that a *separate* team should handle organizing the developer-focused working events than the main team that does the marketing event. I recognize that it's a lot of work and that asking the "community" to just handle the working event organization will lead to undue burden on certain cross-project folks.

However, here are a couple things that do *not* need to be done by a separate team that handles working event organization:

1) Vendor and sponsorship stuff
2) A call for speakers and reviewing thousands of submissions (this is self-organized by each project's contributor team for the working events) 3) Determining keynote slots and wrangling C-level speakers -- or any speaker wrangling at all
4) "Check-in" and registration stands
5) Dealing with schwag, giveaways, parties, and other superfluous stuff

So, yes, while it's a lot of work, it's not the same kind of work as the marketing event staff.

So while I agree it's worth considering whether the Mega Conference and
Design Summit should continue to be collocated and on the same time
table, I think the idea that the Design Summit, at even only 500
attendees, could/should be run without the Foundation is just folly
based on a lack of understanding for what it takes to do events at that
scale.

For the record, I *do* understand what it takes to do events at that scale.

> And massively underestimates the effort and skill the Foundation
has at making our events run as smoothly as they do.

I wasn't saying anything about the effort and skill the Foundation expends on making the marketing events run smoothly.

I am pushing for a return to *working* events for developers.

-jay

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to