Le 6 févr. 2016 20:39, "Steven Dake (stdake)" <std...@cisco.com> a écrit : > > > > On 2/5/16, 1:14 AM, "Eric LEMOINE" <elemo...@mirantis.com> wrote: > > >On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Jeff Peeler <jpee...@redhat.com> wrote: > >I totally agree with you Jeff. > > > >It is to be noted that we (my team at Mirantis) want to avoid > >duplicating our Lua plugins, as we obviously don't want to maintain > >two sets of identical plugins. So there are mulitple reasons for > >creating separate packages for these plugins: a) make it easy the > >share the plugins across different projects, b) avoid maintaining > >multiple sets of identical plugins, and c) avoid clobbering Kolla with > >code not directly related to Kolla - for example, would you really > >like to see Lua tests in Kolla and run Lua tests in the Kolla gates? > >It would indeed be best to have these plugins in the OpenStack Git > >namespace (as Steve Dake said), but we will have to see if that's > >possible in practice. > > > >Thank you all for your responses. > > Eric, > > If I read that correctly, there is some implied resistance to placing > these LUA plugins in the openstack git namespace. Could you enumerate the > issues now please?
We have no problem with placing these Lua plugins in the openstack git namespace. At this point I just don't know if others from the OpenStack community would see this as appropriate. That's all I'm saying.
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
