On 12:27 Feb 05, Dean Troyer wrote: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> > wrote: > > > So, is Poppy "open core"? > > > > It doesn't follow the 'spirit' of open core, but it does have some of the > characteristics, in that the open code is not all that useful, or maybe > even testable, without the commercial component(s) (at this time). > > So while Poppy may not fully qualify for the open core label, it still > fails some of the tests that we want to see, such as a usable open source > implementation.
>From a QA perspective in gate, if we have to rely on a commercial solution (even if donated) to test it, then that's bad. -- Mike Perez __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
