On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 16:21 +0000, Derek Higgins wrote: > Hi All, > > We briefly discussed feature tracking in this weeks tripleo meeting. > I > would like to provide a way for downstream consumers (and ourselves) > to > track new features as they get implemented. The main things that > came > out of the discussion is that people liked the spec-lite process > that > the glance team are using. > > I'm proposing we would start to use the same process, essentially > small > features that don't warrant a blueprint would instead have a > wishlist > bug opened against them and get marked with the spec-lite tag. This > bug > could then be referenced in the commit messages. For larger features > blueprints can still be used. I think the process documented by > glance[1] is a good model to follow so go read that and see what you > think > > The general feeling at the meeting was +1 to doing this[2] so I hope > we > can soon start enforcing it, assuming people are still happy to > proceed?
+1 from me > > thanks, > Derek. > > [1] > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/glance/contributing/blueprints.ht > ml#glance-spec-lite > [2] > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2016/tripleo.2016-01- > 26-14.02.log.html > > _____________________________________________________________________ > _____ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubs > cribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
