Releasing a beta version sounds like a good plan but does OpenStack Infra actually support this?
> 20 січ. 2016 р. о 12:05 Oleg Gelbukh <ogelb...@mirantis.com> написав(ла): > > Hi, > > Currently we're experiencing issues with Python dependencies of our package > (fuel-octane), specifically between fuelclient's dependencies and > keystoneclient dependencies. > > New keystoneclient is required to work with the new version of Nailgun due to > introduction of SSL in the latter. On the other hand, fuelclient is released > along with the main release of Fuel, and the latest version available from > PyPI is 7.0.0, and it has very old dependencies (based on packages available > in centos6/python26). > > The solution I'd like to propose is to release beta version of fuelclient > (8.0.0b1) with updated requirements ASAP. With --pre flag to pip/tox, this > will allow to run unittests against the proper set of requirements. On the > other hand, it will not break the users consuming the latest stable (7.0.0) > version with old requirements from PyPI. > > Please, share your thoughts and considerations. If no objections, I will > create a corresponding bug/blueprint against fuelclient to be fixed in the > current release cycle. > > -- > Best regards, > Oleg Gelbukh > Mirantis > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
