----- Orijinal Mesaj ----- > Kimden: "Markus Zoeller" <mzoel...@de.ibm.com> > Kime: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Gönderilenler: 13 Ocak Çarşamba 2016 17:38:21 > Konu: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] config options: IRC meeting at Jan. 11th
> Esra Celik <celik.e...@tubitak.gov.tr> wrote on 01/13/2016 01:29:12 PM: > > From: Esra Celik <celik.e...@tubitak.gov.tr> > > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Date: 01/13/2016 01:30 PM > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] config options: IRC meeting at Jan. > 11th > > > > > > I do also realize now that I didn't make you aware of the > possibility > > > > to prevent a re-introduction of options in the modules you already > > > > cleaned [1]. I think that could be useful. > > > > References: > > > > [1] > > > > https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/ > > > > 928813ca2b23690b4468830dd70a6cc6048181fa/nova/hacking/checks.py#L567 > > > > > I am not sure if I understood this correctly. Do you mean we should > > > check if any changes to the options occurred since we moved them to > > > nove/conf directory? > > > > No, that's not what I meant. You can enhance the hacking check in your > > "move-config-option" patch to keep that area clean for the future. > > Like I did with the database options in [1]. This gives a hint to other > > contributors, who want to introduce new config options, that they > > should be declared in "nova/conf/". > > > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/263804/2/nova/hacking/checks.py > > OK, got it. I modified nova/hacking/checks.py for my patches. > > > > Thanks a lot > I think I made a mistake to suggest to you to use the "checks.py" module. > Git will again have issues to merge this (e.g. [1]) when another change > also adds a line there. That's the same mistake I made with the > "__init__.py" module. I'm really sorry for that. I think it's best when > you remove it (if you introduced it in your patches) and I introduce > these lines when things get merged. It's not crucial to have it in your > patch, it was supposed to be a helper. > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/254092/9/nova/hacking/checks.py > Slightly ashamed, Markus Zoeller (markus_z) Markus, you are extremely helpful at all stages. I should thank you for that. I see how complicated it is to work concurrently on the same scope. And this experience is a good lesson for me, thanks again. I will remove checks.py changes tomorrow. Best regards esracelik
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev