On 12/22/2015 04:38 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote: > Hi all, > > I mentioned this at the meeting last week, but wanted to get wider input. > As far as I can tell from the current activity, there is no work going into > Tuskar and it isn't being tested with CI. This means the code is becoming > more stale quickly and likely wont work soon (if not already). > > TripleO common is working towards solving the same problems that Tuskar > attempted and can be seen as the replacement for Tuskar. [1][2] > > Are there any objections to it's removal? This would include the tuskar, > python-tuskarclient and tuskar-ui repos. We would also need to remove it > from instack-undercloud and tripleo-image-elements. > > I'll start to beginning the cleanup process sometime in min/late January if > there are no objections. > > Cheers, > Dougal > > > [1]: > https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-specs/specs/mitaka/tripleo-overcloud-deployment-library.html > [2]: https://review.openstack.org/230432 > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > +1
-- Jason E. Rist Senior Software Engineer OpenStack Infrastructure Integration Red Hat, Inc. openuc: +1.972.707.6408 mobile: +1.720.256.3933 Freenode: jrist github/twitter: knowncitizen __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
