I think it may be confusing to a fair number of the users you are targeting. libvirt supports more then just qemu/kvm. xen, virtualbox, and others. saying libvirt makes people have to know that when you say libvirt you mean just the qemu/kvm that nova supports using the implementation detail of using libvirt.
Thanks, Kevin ________________________________ From: Aleksandr Didenko [adide...@mirantis.com] Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 4:16 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][UX] Throw KVM\QEMU and leave Libvirt on Wizard Hi, looks good to me. Regards, Alex On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Andriy Popovych <apopov...@mirantis.com<mailto:apopov...@mirantis.com>> wrote: Hi fuelers, We want to throw KVM/QEMU options from Wizard and instead of them leave only one: Libvirt [0]. Libvirt option enables QEMU by default and there are still be possibility to change it on KVM in settings. It looks more logically because both QEMU\KVM are options for libvirt which manage them. What are you think about it? [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/258690 __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
