> -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Cordasco [mailto:ian.corda...@rackspace.com] > Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 8:13 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][keystone][artifacts] Service Catalog > name for Glance Artifact Repository API > > > > On 12/11/15, 12:25, "Alexander Tivelkov" <ativel...@mirantis.com> wrote: > > >Hi folks! > > > > > >As it was decided during the Mitaka design summit, we are separating > >the experimental Artifact Repository API from the main Glance API. This > >API will have a versioning sequence independent from the main Glance > >API and will be run as a standalone optional service, listening on the > >port different from the standard glance-api port (currently the > >proposed default is 9393). Meanwhile, it will remain an integral part > >of the larger Glance project, sharing the database, implementation > >roadmap, development and review teams etc. > > +1 to 9494 for DevStack so developers can run Arti and Searchlight along > side each other. > > >Since this API will be consumed by both end-users and other Openstack > >services, its endpoint should be discoverable via regular service > >catalog API. This rises the question: what should be the service name > >and service type for the appropriate entree in the service catalog? > > > > > >We've came out with the idea to call the service "glare" (this is our > >internal codename for the artifacts initiative, being an acronym for > >"GLance Artifact REpository") and set its type to "artifacts". Other > >alternatives for the name may be "arti" or "glance_artifacts" > > and for the type - "assets" or "objects" (the latter may be confusing > >since swift's type is object-store, so I personally don't like it). > > For the type, I would think either "asset" or "artifact" (along the lines of > how > glance is "image", and neutron is "network"). I tend to lean towards > "artifact" > though. > > As for the "default" (I assume DevStack) name, why not just "glare", the > description should be "Glance Artifact Service" (which I think is slightly > more > end-user important than the name).
++ - Erno > > >Well... we all know, naming is complicated... anyway, I'll appreciate > >any feedback on this. Thanks! > > > > > > > >-- > > > >Regards, > >Alexander Tivelkov > > > > -- > Cheers, > Ian > > __________________________________________________________ > ________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev- > requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
