FYI: the process is in effect now.
Please submit specs to https://github.com/openstack/ironic-inspector-specs/
Approved specs will appear on
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/ironic-inspector-specs/
On 11/19/2015 02:19 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
Hi folks!
I've been dodging subj for some time (mostly due to my laziness), but
now it seems like the time has come. We're discussing 2 big features:
autodiscovery and HA that I would like us to have a proper consensus on.
I'd like to get your opinion on one of the options:
1. Do not have specs, only blueprints are enough for us.
2. Reuse ironic-specs repo, create our own subdirectory with our own
template
3. Create a new ironic-inspector-specs repo.
I vote for #2, as sharing a repo with the remaining ironic would
increase visibility of large inspector changes (i.e. those deserving a
spec). We would probably use [inspector] tag in the commit summary, so
that people explicitly NOT wanting to review them can quickly ignore.
Also note that I still see #1 (use only blueprints) as a way to go for
simple features.
WDYT?
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
